Well, this is interesting.
As far as I am concerned - it isn't a matter of who won or lost - but we all do not win if our votes are not properly counted. CT Voters Count also blogged THIS.
New Hampshire District Admits Ron Paul Vote Skew
Sutton township reported Congressman had zero votes, actual number was 31
Article by Paul Joseph Watson
The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.
As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.
Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming "human error" was responsible for the mistake.
Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake - but 31 votes for one candidate?
"The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write the wrong number on the form," Harris told the Alex Jones Show.
"They are counting everything in public real nice, they fill out a form in public real nice and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet and then that is the one they send in," explained Harris.
"What happened is she said they did not transfer the number correctly and put zero instead of 31 - that is unacceptable as an answer."
With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map originally listed zero votes for Ron Paul as you can see below. It has now been updated to reflect the 31 votes Paul actually received.
The remainder of the 31 people in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul need to go public immediately with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.
Harris estimates that it could cost the Ron Paul campaign as much as $67,000 dollars for a recount, but such a move could throw the entire primary into doubt, especially in light of the fact that Barack Obama appears to have been cheated out of a win by Hillary Clinton.
A similar problem surfaced in Greenville as well.
What has also been circulating is that Hillary Clinton Received A 4.5% Boost In "Diebold" Towns. This is interesting given the controversy over the Diebold machines.
With all the brouhaha about the polls not matching the results of this primary vote - it seems prudent to force the Secretary of State of New Hampshire to demand automatic recounts of ALL votes cast in this primary, especially with this episode in Sutton.