National Home Education Legal Defense put out a bulletin today regarding the possibility of mandatory swine flu vaccinations in American schools this fall.
The bulletin says this:
On the website for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,it was announced that the federal government is committed to “developing a national response framework and action plan” to prepare for a more serious outbreak of the swine flu in the fall.Now we know that exemptions do exist - but they can be limited. What we do know is that the government can use the public purse as a coercive measure to get states to comply with various initiatives. Aside from that there is the larger issue of safety with these vaccines. The last time a flu epidemic hit in 1976, the vaccine used to combat it created more fatalities than the disease. (See my previous post on this issue). The reality is that pharmaceutical companies are in bed with government. We already know how many lobbyists for big Pharma are in Washington and in our own State houses. They look to government to mandate the use of their products and even help them to market them. This has been evidenced by HPV vaccine legislation that was attempted across the country. Why should American school children be used to prop up the financial bottomline for companies that have so much to gain from vaccination legislation? It's especially distasteful when used in the context of "preparedness" or "public safety", and of course the media is also employed to conjure up fear and to feed the public what it wants them to hear.
Although the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services website does not state that the vaccinations will be “mandatory”, it does say that the federal government is “partnering” with state and local governments in this effort. That’s primarily because the federal government inherently does not have any Constitutional authority to mandate that school children receive any vaccinations. That authority is a power that is left to the States and to the people pursuant to the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Over time, however, the people in most states have allowed their elected officials to implement state laws that do mandate vaccinations for school children. According to the Congressional Research Service, in a report released in 2005, every state has a law requiring children to be vaccinated before they enrolled in a public or a private school.
The NHELD bulletin goes on to say this:
For now, at least, it would appear that the federal government is relying on a more familiar technique to accomplish its goals. It is, once again, dangling federal tax dollars in front of state officials to get the states to do its bidding. The Health and Human Services Department website notes that the federal government will make available to the states “preparedness grants worth a total of $350 million” so the states can “step up” their “preparedness efforts.”So while the State may at some point make mandates, you as a parent must consider, “Will the vaccines be safe for your child?” It may be hard to answer that question entirely, but some interesting items are revealed on the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc. website. Their “Fact Sheet on Mandatory Vaccines” cites these facts:
It is also highly interesting for parents to note that the Health and Human Services Secretary, Kathleen Sebelius, also indicated in news reports that “no final decision has been made on whether to vaccinate Americans” yet because it “depends largely on studies with experimental batches…[of the vaccine] to see if they’re safe and seem to work…” (Emphasis added).
Not to worry, though. She hopes that “all goes well”. If it does, she added, the federal government would buy the vaccine from manufacturers and share it among the states to get it to the “targeted population as soon as possible.” Whom did she say was first in line for the vaccine? School children, of course, would be first. In fact, the federal government’s Education Secretary Arne Duncan said, “Schools are natural places” to offer those vaccines.
- “The Centers for Disease Control admits that the reported number of adverse effects of vaccines is probably only 10% of actual adverse effects;”NHELD says this:
- “Rampant conflicts of interest in the approval process has been the subject of several Congressional hearings, and a recent Congressional report concluded that the pharmaceutical industry has indeed exerted undue influence on mandatory vaccine legislation toward its own financial interests;”
- “The vaccine approval process has also been contaminated by flawed or incomplete clinical trials, and government officials have chosen to ignore negative results;” and
- “Mandatory vaccines violate the medical ethic of informed consent. A case could also be made that mandates for vaccines by school districts and legislatures is the de facto practice of medicine without a license.”
Aside from the controversies surrounding the possibility of adverse side effects, the efficacy of the vaccine, and whether or not parents actually will be provided with sufficient information to offer informed consent, parents need to consider whether they will have any ability to consent, at all, before their children are required to receive the vaccine.If the government makes swine flu vaccination mandatory for school kids - under whatever means in their power, do parents who object to the vaccine have a choice? Is there another solution?
Before this fall, parents need to ask, “Is my state mandating that my child obtain the swine flu vaccine as a prerequisite to attending school? After all, the states already require children to receive other vaccinations as a prerequisite to attending school. Will the swine flu, become just another one of the vaccinations already required?
An even better question to ask is, “Will the State be compelled to require children to receive the swine flu vaccine as a condition of the State receiving its share of the $350 million dollars that the federal government is providing to the States for swine flu preparedness?” That is the preferred method, to date, when the federal government wants to mandate the implementation of its will. Why wouldn’t the federal government utilize that same method when it comes to dictating what vaccinations your child will receive?
If the federal government does make such a deal with the States as a means to achieving its goal of having children vaccinated, what is a concerned parent to do? If a child cannot attend school, public or private, (private schools also already must comply with State imposed vaccination laws), without receiving the swine flu vaccination, and the parent objects to the child receiving the swine flu vaccine out of concern for possible adverse effects, the parent then either risks the child’s health, or risks the possibility of having the child be considered truant.
NHELD says The answer to that is yes.
At that point, the parent can choose to homeschool. Most state laws regarding vaccination only apply to children upon entrance to public and private school. They do not require children who are homeschooled to obtain those vaccinations. That’s because the purpose of vaccination of the population in public and private school is to stop the spread of the disease in that community where the children congregate in large numbers, and where it is more difficult to control the spread of germs and to maintain a clean environment.Informed consent is a right parents must protect.
The purpose of the vaccination no longer exists, however, at least not anywhere near to the same extent, when children are educated at home. Their numbers are smaller and their environment is easier to maintain in a relatively germ free manner. While normally homeschooled children are not recluses, in the midst of an epidemic there is no need to fear that they will either get, or spread, the infectious disease because the parents can regulate their contact with other children. Nor is there any need to fear that their education will suffer when their education takes place in the home in any case. Their parents likely will remain highly motivated to keep the children from exposure during the outbreak, while at the same time to continue their educational routine unabated.
While there are many diverse reasons why parents homeschool, and while it is still uncertain at this time whether swine flu vaccinations will become mandatory, come this fall, there may be one more very good reason why parents may choose to homeschool.
A parent should not be cited for medical neglect if they opt to refuse a certain treatment or vaccination for their child, yet we know that this happens. The question begs to be asked then - who is in control of the health of a child? The parent or the State? And if something DOES happen to the child as a result of treatment or vaccine, shouldn't the family have a right to sue and collect damages from the State, School district, and pharmaceutical company? Where is the liability?
Choices must be kept available, and if the school mandates things that you do not agree with, regarding vaccination or anything else, then your choice to homeschool may be appropriate.
Your child does NOT belong to the State.