Tuesday, January 25, 2011

SCOTUS Declares Constitution Void

William M. Windsor has been trying to fight judicial corruption for years, and has even taken it to the Supreme Court only to have his petition denied... which basically translates into the SCOTUS saying that the lower courts are allowed to ignore the Constitution and condones the corruption that is present in the lower courts.

Critics argue that William M. Windsor was unjustified in his petition to the court and that he is some sort of nutcase.. but honestly.. this landmark decision says a lot that isn't pleasant about the state of our judiciary.

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void
ATLANTA, Jan. 18, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision that serves to allow judges to void the Constitution in their courtrooms. The decision was issued on January 18, 2011, and the Court did not even explain the decision (Docket No. 10-632, 10-633, and 10-690). One word decisions: DENIED.

Presented with this information and massive proof that was not contested in any manner by the accused judges, at least six of the justices voted to deny the petitions:

"There is no legal or factual basis whatsoever for the decisions of the lower courts in this matter. These rulings were issued for corrupt reasons. Many of the judges in the Northern District of Georgia and the Eleventh Circuit are corrupt and violate laws and rules, as they have done in this case. The Supreme Court must recognize this Petition as one of the most serious matters ever presented to this Court."

The key questions answered negatively by the U.S. Supreme Court was:

"Whether federal courts must be stopped from operating corruptly and ignoring all laws, rules, and facts."

By denying the petitions, SCOTUS has chosen to sanction corruption by federal judges and to allow federal judges to void sections of the Constitutional at will.

William M. Windsor has been involved in legal action in the federal courts in Atlanta since 2006. Windsor was named a defendant in a civil lawsuit (1:06-CV-0714-ODE) in which Christopher Glynn of Maid of the Mist in Niagara Falls, swore under oath that Windsor did a variety of things including the crimes of theft and bribery. Windsor stated under oath that Christopher Glynn made it up and lied about absolutely everything that he swore. Windsor then obtained deposition testimony from Glynn and the other managers of the Maid of the Mist boat ride, and they admitted, under oath, that charges against Windsor were not true.

Despite this undeniable proof, 32-year federal Judge Orinda D. Evans declared that the grandfather of three should not have fought the lawsuit, and she forced him to pay a fortune in legal fees of Maid of the Mist. Windsor appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, but federal judges Dubina, Hull, and Fay rubber-stamped Judge Evans' ruling. Windsor then took his appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court where the justices said the appeal was not worthy of their consideration (cert denied).

After attempting to get the case reopened with new evidence that proved fraud upon the courts and obstruction of justice, Judge Evans and Judge William S. Duffey committed a variety of crimes and violations of Constitutional rights, as did judges with the Eleventh Circuit. All of this was detailed for the Supreme Court.

Windsor says: "I have discovered that the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia, Washington, DC, and the justices of the United States Supreme Court function like common criminals intentionally making bogus rulings against honest people while covering up the crimes of their fellow judges. I have been contacted by people from all over the country and around the world with their stories of judicial corruption with judges all over the U.S.

"My charges have been totally ignored by the United States Attorney's Office, the FBI, and Congress. I do not believe there is a shred of decency, honesty, or Constitutional rights in our federal courts. In my opinion, we now live in a police state. Judges are free to do absolutely anything they want. Our laws are meaningless. Your life savings can be stolen by a federal judge, and they have no risk in violating every law in the books.

"In my opinion, this is the most serious issue that our country has ever faced. Our rights have been stolen. And the mainstream media refuses to cover this story because they are afraid of the judges. Heaven help us.

"I believe our only hope in America is if the masses become aware of what is taking place. I am writing an expose, and my book will be available at Borders, Barnes & Noble, and on amazon.com soon. The publisher will decide if the title is Lawless America or Screwed, Glued, and Tattooed."

The thing of it is - that if SCOTUS does in fact condone the corruption in the lower courts - and if they in fact deny righting any of the wrongs in lower court legal proceedings - then we do indeed have a renegade judiciary.

I know lawyers who tell me that the courts are rife with corruption. In many instances, key evidence is denied being exhibited or submitted and Judges do not follow the law. Judges legislate from the bench; not by what the law is but by what they think the law should be. We have key cases being dismissed on grounds of "no standing" and other such judicial maneuverings. Higher courts may just rubber stamp the appeal cases coming before them and go along with a lower courts finding... even if there is evidence that shows the lower court did not provide a fair hearing.

And now since the SCOTUS basically ruled that they did not believe that federal courts must be stopped from operating corruptly and ignoring all laws, rules, and facts... well that does in fact void the Constitution.... the Constitution that, by the way, gives power to the SCOTUS.

"We are in real trouble when the Constitution is meaningless and judges commit crimes hiding behind their robes." - William M. Windsor

Perhaps it's about time we start re-calling and impeaching judges and having them thrown off the bench.
It's about time something is done about the injustice being meted out in American courtrooms.

Congress should review all of these federal judges - request input from the public as to their adherence to the Constitution and the law - and if these judges are not shown to be doing their jobs properly then they ought to be booted out by Congress. Each Congressional representative takes an oath to uphold the Constitution and this is yet another way they can do so.

Impeach the corrupt judges.

Check out the Center for Judicial Accountability and American Judicature Society


Anonymous said...

I have read this same thing on different blogs and there is a huge weakness in the arguement. It is impossibel to tell the facts and the man appears to be hiding the facts. What was said? What was actually done? Who said what, exactly? I get the feeling that the judges saw through this guys stories. Now if that isn't true and he has an ironclad case then tell us the story. But the fact that he dances around the story gives me zero confidence he is right.

Judy Aron said...

Meh... I don't agree. I think he has a valid argument about lower courts being allowed to be corrupt and unanswerable to anyone. They ARE corrupt. The 9th circuit is a joke all together.

and at least Windsor has the balls to bring the argument forward.
Now we know where SCOTUS stands on this.. and what's more they have answered NO to the question, "Should federal courts be stopped from operating corruptly and ignoring all laws, rules, and facts".

It's plain to me.. and I don't see anyone dancing around any issue here.

If you aren't convinced then go read the trial transcript or visit Windsor's website to see what his gripe is.

William M. Windsor said...

I am William M. Windsor. I suspect "Anonymous" is a government shill working to deflect the truth. How is it impossible to tell the facts when I have linked all of them to the website? The entire contents of my three petitions are linked -- http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php/news/blog-of-william-m-windsor/132-supreme-court-to-issue-landmark-decision-on-the-constitution

Where and how have I danced around anything? That's just silly.

What was done? Well, that would take a long time to list here. But here are just a few of the Constitutional violations: Denial of due process in many forms. I was never granted a hearing in five years -- not once. I have been denied the legal right to file a lawsuit; the judges have the clerks intercept them. When the opposing party got a hearing, I was denied the ability to obtain subpoenas for witnesses (pro se parties can't subpoena witnesses without a subpoena signed by the Clerk of the Court). I was denied the right to call a single witness. I was denied the right to cross-examine witnesses. I was denied the right to put documents into evidence. Judge Orinda D. Evans committed over 200 counts of perjury in her orders -- making statements that were absolutely false as proven by the record before the court. Judge William S. Duffey and most of the judges of the Eleventh Circuit lied as well. In five years, there was never a single court order that was valid based upon the law. In was denied an impartial judge; the judges were totally biased and refused to recuse themselves. The judges of the Eleventh Circuit have denied me the ability to petition for rehearing en banc or file motions for reconsideration. The Supreme Court Clerk's office failed to file motions that I properly presented. The Supreme Court has not issued a valid order based upon statute. The Supreme Court Clerk has denied me access to my court docket files. I documented that the entire verified petition filed against me was false; I documented this with the sworn deposition testimony of the fellow managers of the guy who filed the false sworn complaint. I presented this evidence to Judge Evans along with over 400 proven lies in depositions, and she refused to even consider it.

So, Mr. or Ms. Anonymous, what exactly would you like to know?

The facts are that our federal judicial system is hopelessly corrupt. I have received over 4,000 emails just in the last week from people telling their stories.

Judy Aron said...

... and there you have it -
Thank you Mr. Windsor for your comment. Thank you for your perseverance.

4,000 emails? I'll bet that's just the tip of the iceberg.

My lawyer friend told me that these days we should do anything and everything to stay out of the court system. It's a nightmare. She comes across corrupt judges everyday, and she fights them, whereas other attorneys just cower and grovel.

By the way, don't you love how the "anonymous" people lack the courage to put their real name to their comments?

Anonymous said...

Has anyone actually ever seen a government shill? I can assure I am not one. You did not answer the question. I suppose I could go read the transcripts if I wanted to give up a couple days of my life. What I am basing my decision on is simple; after reading what you wrote I don't know what happened. You want to concentrate on what the judges did or didn't do and I want to know what YOU did. Did you pull off a practical joke that backfired? Did you fake a fall? Did you work for the guy and steal pencils? What?? And what did they guy chatge you with? Your lack of information about the facts and your excessive muddying of the waters with minutiae tells me you are covering something up. It appears to me that it was your intent to tie up the case with formalities and proceedings and the judge saw through your ploy and cut to the chase. So in 25 words or less what did you do?? Put up or shut up.

Judy Aron said...

Anonymous - Mr. Windsor DID explain what the judges did or didn't do. Do you believe the court system is NOT corrupt? What's YOUR proof?

I have seen lots of proof that the system is broken. Judges do whatever the hell they want. That's not a fair justice system.

By the way - is there a reason you can't put your real name to your comments? Put up or shut up.