Tuesday, January 25, 2011

SCOTUS Declares Constitution Void

William M. Windsor has been trying to fight judicial corruption for years, and has even taken it to the Supreme Court only to have his petition denied... which basically translates into the SCOTUS saying that the lower courts are allowed to ignore the Constitution and condones the corruption that is present in the lower courts.

Critics argue that William M. Windsor was unjustified in his petition to the court and that he is some sort of nutcase.. but honestly.. this landmark decision says a lot that isn't pleasant about the state of our judiciary.

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void
ATLANTA, Jan. 18, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision that serves to allow judges to void the Constitution in their courtrooms. The decision was issued on January 18, 2011, and the Court did not even explain the decision (Docket No. 10-632, 10-633, and 10-690). One word decisions: DENIED.

Presented with this information and massive proof that was not contested in any manner by the accused judges, at least six of the justices voted to deny the petitions:

"There is no legal or factual basis whatsoever for the decisions of the lower courts in this matter. These rulings were issued for corrupt reasons. Many of the judges in the Northern District of Georgia and the Eleventh Circuit are corrupt and violate laws and rules, as they have done in this case. The Supreme Court must recognize this Petition as one of the most serious matters ever presented to this Court."

The key questions answered negatively by the U.S. Supreme Court was:

"Whether federal courts must be stopped from operating corruptly and ignoring all laws, rules, and facts."

By denying the petitions, SCOTUS has chosen to sanction corruption by federal judges and to allow federal judges to void sections of the Constitutional at will.

William M. Windsor has been involved in legal action in the federal courts in Atlanta since 2006. Windsor was named a defendant in a civil lawsuit (1:06-CV-0714-ODE) in which Christopher Glynn of Maid of the Mist in Niagara Falls, swore under oath that Windsor did a variety of things including the crimes of theft and bribery. Windsor stated under oath that Christopher Glynn made it up and lied about absolutely everything that he swore. Windsor then obtained deposition testimony from Glynn and the other managers of the Maid of the Mist boat ride, and they admitted, under oath, that charges against Windsor were not true.

Despite this undeniable proof, 32-year federal Judge Orinda D. Evans declared that the grandfather of three should not have fought the lawsuit, and she forced him to pay a fortune in legal fees of Maid of the Mist. Windsor appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, but federal judges Dubina, Hull, and Fay rubber-stamped Judge Evans' ruling. Windsor then took his appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court where the justices said the appeal was not worthy of their consideration (cert denied).

After attempting to get the case reopened with new evidence that proved fraud upon the courts and obstruction of justice, Judge Evans and Judge William S. Duffey committed a variety of crimes and violations of Constitutional rights, as did judges with the Eleventh Circuit. All of this was detailed for the Supreme Court.

Windsor says: "I have discovered that the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia, Washington, DC, and the justices of the United States Supreme Court function like common criminals intentionally making bogus rulings against honest people while covering up the crimes of their fellow judges. I have been contacted by people from all over the country and around the world with their stories of judicial corruption with judges all over the U.S.

"My charges have been totally ignored by the United States Attorney's Office, the FBI, and Congress. I do not believe there is a shred of decency, honesty, or Constitutional rights in our federal courts. In my opinion, we now live in a police state. Judges are free to do absolutely anything they want. Our laws are meaningless. Your life savings can be stolen by a federal judge, and they have no risk in violating every law in the books.

"In my opinion, this is the most serious issue that our country has ever faced. Our rights have been stolen. And the mainstream media refuses to cover this story because they are afraid of the judges. Heaven help us.

"I believe our only hope in America is if the masses become aware of what is taking place. I am writing an expose, and my book will be available at Borders, Barnes & Noble, and on amazon.com soon. The publisher will decide if the title is Lawless America or Screwed, Glued, and Tattooed."

The thing of it is - that if SCOTUS does in fact condone the corruption in the lower courts - and if they in fact deny righting any of the wrongs in lower court legal proceedings - then we do indeed have a renegade judiciary.

I know lawyers who tell me that the courts are rife with corruption. In many instances, key evidence is denied being exhibited or submitted and Judges do not follow the law. Judges legislate from the bench; not by what the law is but by what they think the law should be. We have key cases being dismissed on grounds of "no standing" and other such judicial maneuverings. Higher courts may just rubber stamp the appeal cases coming before them and go along with a lower courts finding... even if there is evidence that shows the lower court did not provide a fair hearing.

And now since the SCOTUS basically ruled that they did not believe that federal courts must be stopped from operating corruptly and ignoring all laws, rules, and facts... well that does in fact void the Constitution.... the Constitution that, by the way, gives power to the SCOTUS.

"We are in real trouble when the Constitution is meaningless and judges commit crimes hiding behind their robes." - William M. Windsor

Perhaps it's about time we start re-calling and impeaching judges and having them thrown off the bench.
It's about time something is done about the injustice being meted out in American courtrooms.

Congress should review all of these federal judges - request input from the public as to their adherence to the Constitution and the law - and if these judges are not shown to be doing their jobs properly then they ought to be booted out by Congress. Each Congressional representative takes an oath to uphold the Constitution and this is yet another way they can do so.

Impeach the corrupt judges.

Check out the Center for Judicial Accountability and American Judicature Society