Tuesday, June 7, 2011

US Department Of Education Sued



Another interesting tidbit on this unconstitutional entity.
Along with dictating education standards - something it is illegal to do in the first place - the US Department of Education is allegedly in bed with some hedge fund managers and allegedly doing some very very shady things...

First let's look at the US Department of Education's involvement with the Gainful Employment Rule, as Inside Higher Education reports:

Last July, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) proposed its “Gainful Employment Rule,” which seeks to establish complex measures for determining whether education programs at proprietary postsecondary education institutions (and vocational programs at nonprofit colleges) lead to gainful employment in a recognized occupation. Under the proposed rule, a program’s eligibility for federal student financial aid under Title IV of the Higher Education Act would be based on meeting certain metrics related to student loan debt. ED recently sent a revised version of this regulation to the Office of Management and Budget, the agency in charge of reviewing regulations before they are made final. The revised rule could be out any day.

So now, the Department of Education is going to decide whether a college can get student loan funding based on whether or not its curriculum will lead to "gainful employment in a recognized occupation"!

This is what happens when student loan funding is under the total control of the Department of Education. Through the purse strings they will now determine college course and degree directions.

I say these colleges should tell the government to pound sand and reject government student funding all together. It's the only way to keep their autonomy.

But I digress... the real story is about to unfold....

Of course there has been much opposition to this Gainful Employment Rule because of the extra accounting it creates and the privacy issue of students’ records which are supposed to be handed over to the US Department of Education and any other government agency that wants them. It will of course hurt many educational institutions. This is government over-reach and power grab at its worst... but wait there's more.....

The Hill reported:

Against all logic and growing opposition from both sides of the political spectrum, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) seems poised and determined to proceed with the new Gainful Employment regulations, which would serve as a guidepost for their issuance of federal student loans for private sector colleges. The proposed Gainful Employment regulations would require that career education providers and programs provide students for “gainful employment” in recognized occupations.

To determine if these programs are eligible, ED wants to tie its federal loans to students’ debt-to-income ratio as well as the repayment rates of the for-profit institution. While there has been much debate over the origin of this proposal, its impact could not be more clear: for-profit colleges would suffer and, more significantly, low-income and minority college enrollment would drop precipitously…

…But the real answer may be more simple. After reviewing the correspondence between ED officials and parties with a financial interest in increased regulations of for-profit colleges, Sen. Mike Enzi asked for the U.S. Attorney in New York to investigate. Already, the Department of Education’s Inspector General is looking into conflict of interest charges. Slowly, yet ever so clearly, a cloud is forming around the motives of those crafting the gainful employment rules and short sellers who stand to profit if private-sector education stocks tumble. [Emphasis added.]

Ok - let's see where these regulations came from and why this is happening in the first place. Let's put the puzzle pieces together and follow the money... because there's lots of money to be followed... especially in education.

The Department of Education apparently had some help crafting this regulation... and it allegedly came from hedgefund manager Steve Eisman (manager with FrontPoint Partners)

Dealbook states:

“once a multibillion-dollar hedge fund before it was battered by allegations of insider trading,...“During the financial crisis, the hedge fund was lauded for the insight of one of its most colorful managers, Steve Eisman, who had placed a bet against the subprime mortgage market that earned him hundreds of millions…”

How interesting it is that Steve Eisman is now warning of the same kind of "short situation" (see illustration below) happening in higher education (even while FrontPoint is closing down operations). In Eisman’s latest speech titled, “Subprime Goes to College” Eisman says this:

“Until recently, I thought that there would never again be an opportunity to be involved with an industry as socially destructive and morally bankrupt as the subprime mortgage industry. I was wrong, The for-profit education industry has proven equal to the task.”

An article dated May 31, 2011 and titled “Education Department Rules on For-Profit Schools Created With Investor’s Help.” states that Steve Eisman (who gave a speech to help save us from the social destruction and morally bankruptcy of for-profit and vocational colleges) allegedly helped craft the regulation with the Department of Education!

A proposed regulation from the Education Department threatens to devastate for-profit career or trade schools, but one thing is even more controversial than the regulation — how it was crafted.

Education Department officials were encouraged and advised about the content of the regulation by a man who stood to make millions if it were issued.

“Wall Street investors were manipulating the regulatory process and Department of Education officials were letting them,” charged Melanie Sloan of a liberal-leaning ethics watchdog called Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

So if seems that Mr. Eisman with the Department of Education in tow, allegedly set up a scheme that would make Mr. Eisman a very very rich man... and would hurt thousands of students and schools in the process. (The article continues...)

[Melanie] Sloan has sued the Department of Education over the matter and called on the Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate. An inspector general is also investigating whether officials shared sensitive information with officers of a hedge fund that stood to gain from it.

“It is an entirely new thing to actually try and manipulate the regulation in order to change the stock price and make a lot of money,” she said.

Among others, Sloan is referring to Steven Eisman, a hedge fund manager and a figure in the book “The Big Short,” who testified in the Senate against for-profit career or trade schools, attacking them as “fundamentally unsound.”

At the same time, he was betting that the stocks of those companies would fall, a practice known as short selling. “Making sure that they were going to be defamed and that their value was going to be depressed,” said Harry Alford, head of the National Black Chamber of Commerce, who worries about the schools because they serve many minority students.

Simultaneously, through emails and conference calls, Eisman was advising Education Department officials — and one White House adviser — in detail on how best to write the new regulation, which he estimated would reduce the schools’ earnings by as much as 75 percent.

The proposed regulation from the administration is aimed at what are known as career or vocational schools. The rule would cut federal aid to programs where student debt levels are deemed to be too high and where students are struggling to repay their loans.

Rep. Rob Andrews, D-N.J., said: “There are some very serious questions about the manipulation of the stock market by some short sellers here, who stand to benefit if the value of the schools drops and who therefore stood to benefit from the rule being put in place.”

On May 26, 2010, Eisman emailed several education department officials, including Secretary Arne Duncan and policy director David Bergeron, sending them a PowerPoint presentation on for-profit schools which he noted was “very negative on the industry.”

And he warned that “if nothing is done, we are on the cusp of a new social disaster” as he argued that student loan defaults could equal the subprime mortgage meltdown that crippled the economy.

But on June 14, 2010, an outside interest group cautioned officials by email about Eisman, saying, “Keep in mind that this guy is a short-seller and as such has a tendency to exaggerate.”

“In some emails you see Department of Education officials caution other officials about how involved they should be with Eisman, given that he has a financial interest in for-profit stocks,” Sloan said.

In one email, Eisman mentioned rumors the Department was going to weaken the regulation and urged officials not to back off.

Though no official from the Education Department would appear on camera, officials did issue this statement to Fox News:

“We went out of our way to speak with as many people as possible, including numerous members of the for-profit college industry and their advocates to ensure that our efforts would do the best job of protecting tax payer dollars against waste, fraud, and abuse.”

But a former Clinton official said if the shoe were on the other foot, Democrats would have a fit, and for good reason. “If it was a Republican administration that were doing this, the Democrats would be on the floor of the Congress in the House and Senate screaming bloody outrage.”

Calls to Eisman’s office for comment were not returned.

No one denies that some for-profit schools have questionable practices that should be curtailed.

But critics say that is no excuse to work with a hedge fund manager who stood to gain from the regulation whose content he was trying to guide.

So either Wall Street hedge fund operator Eisman is trying to save a whole generation of Americans from self-inflicted economic demise... or he's setting himself up to have a very fine feathered nest...(could be both! That's how hedges work!)

It's all pretty nasty that this type of (alleged) manipulation is going on.
Let's hope this lawsuit sticks - and better yet - lets hope this "Gainful Employment Rule" gets exposed for the destructive power grabbing idiocy that it is.

And investigators... bring them in by the truckload! This needs to be exposed and people need to do some very big explaining and/or be put into jail.... and please somebody in Congress... do America a favor and dismantle this corruption called the Department of Education.






(H/T - Linda Dobson)

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Many of these schools in question offer over priced training in questionable fields. $25,000 to become a medical clerk. They make big claims about salaries and job availability and are in fact little more then scams. These scams need to be shown for what they are. However I will make a compromise with you:
My compromise is we will get the government and the education department off their backs and in return no student choosing these schools can get government loans tuition aid or grants of anykind. Fair enough???

Judy Aron said...

Compromise? You want to make a compromise with me? To what end? And who are you anyway?

You want to talk about scams??? How about the scam that is the Department of Education? or the Scam that is our overpriced (thanks to easy student government backed credit) and over rated university system... Have you visited a college campus in the past 10 years? The quality of students is appalling. In fact, it's really scary. Most need remedial courses. Most should not even BE in college. Most are busy drinking themselves into oblivion and partying away their parents tuition.

How about Congress abolish the unconstitutional Department of Education all together! and get their mafia like little fingers out of student loan financing!

How about kids learn real skills like how to make stuff, be producers, and become entrepreneurs instead of Sociologists and Social Workers and Lawyers? Most college degrees are total BS, and then kids get strapped with loans they cannot pay and end up working in jobs that are the equivalent of corporate slavery.